Sunday, February 17, 2008

On Science.


I hate science.
I don't understand it.

I attended 14 schools in 12 years in three different education jurisdictions: Ontario, Alberta and the NWT. It left huge gaps in my education and one of the biggest casualties was science. I know next to nothing about Earth Science (in fact until a few weeks ago, I didn't even know what the term meant) nor Astronomy. Don't ask me anything about Physics. And what I do know about plants, animals and the body is shaky.

I mean, I do find certain things fascinating, like tugor preassure and heliocentrism. I think it's cool that trees and plants photosynthesize during the day and then reverse the process at night. (They do, don't they? I can't quite remember.) The fact that all bugs have six legs and three body bits--and yet are so incredibly different from each other is amazing. (Those facts could be wrong, though. Don't quote me.) I think the human body is a miracle.

But, that's no excuse for not doing science with the kids. Part of why we don't do science--though I have three full curriculae on my shelves--is that I don't know what we need to learn. As far as I can figure out, there are at least four different approaches you could take:

  • A. Nature Study
    Go for walks with a sketchbook. Learn to draw. Label the drawings when you get home from good reference books. Observe things happening in the world. Find out why it works that way (eg, cranes at a construction site. Condensation on windows, etc.)


  • B. Forgo textbooks and formal learning and just get a bunch of books on how to do experiments and muck about.


  • C. Read our way through science.
    Use a spine for topics in a particular area of study and pick topics to be studied. Read about the topic, make a narration page, read picture books, biographies, and I don't know what else. Maybe do an activity or experiment or two and write it up, somehow.


  • D. Buy a text book, do what it says. But here too, one must make further choices:

    • a) Cover one subject in depth for a whole year--like the Apologia texts do, or,

    • b) Cover a few (or more) topics lightly, knowing you will return to study it in more depth later. Pick a few topics (related to your history cycle) each year and pick and choose from what's out there what to do.


Now, factor in that I have two children nearly three years apart in age and that I want to do the same thing with both of them together. I need a curriculum which will demand more from the elder without boring or overtaxing the younger.

YIKES!!

For the Grammar stage, the WTM recommends something very like approach C. (In fact, I looked it up!) Topics are correlated to the history cycle, though they say this isn't strictly necessary.

But for what it's worth:
Ancients: Animals, Plants and the Human Body.
Middle Ages: Earth Sciece and Astronomy
Renaissance and Reformation: Chemistry
Modern Era: Physics.

makes a lot of sense, right?

For the Logic/Dialectic stage the same topics are re-visited, (Grades 5-8) and then again at the High School or Rhetoric level.

But here's what they say about science in the Fifth grade:
You have the same topics you studied in Grade One (Ancients), Animals, Plants and the Human Body but you'll "study basic cell structures, learn about the environments they share and then branch out into the study of classification." In other words, you start to make connections as you delve more deeply into the subject(s).

In its procedure, it comes fairly close to what I understand about Nature Study, only we could call it artificial nature study, since one sets up an experiment first.

1. Set up an experiment, do an "experiment" report.
2. Do a sketch of the specific topic being studied.
3. Write a report on the area under investigation.
4. memory work: identify and define the scientific terms one ought to know.

Egads. It is thorough. It is sound. And it's a lot of work for Mom to pull it together--especially when you consider I'm doing this with a third grader tagging along who will have her own stuff to do. We have most of this school year yet to complete (Middle Ages: earth Science and astronomy. [shudder] and next year to plan and prepare for. It'll be chemistry, which is good. I did well in Chemistry and liked it until I flailed about in the unit on Organic Chem. and barely passed it. Then, I just wasn't interested anymore.

I really have to pull together something NOW! I have a little unit on the human body which is a quick and easy introduction to all the neat, cool systems in the human body. We're just not getting to it.

I hate science.
I really don't understand it.

5 comments:

drwende said...

What would make the teacher find science interesting and learnable?

You can't effectively teach what you don't understand, and the kids will pick up on your feeling bored or grim about it.

I'm a huge fan of the "nature study" and "experiment" approaches, but I like science and therefore feel comfortable winging it through a "let's explore, let's go look things up" conversation. If you yourself aren't comfortable with your understanding of how stuff in the natural world fits together, you won't spot the teachable moments.

In your case, I'd lean toward starting with texts and then going looking for applications, so that you have more control over how things go.

Do the children's rooms at libraries still have lots of nice books on bugs and such? I went through a huge bug phase in first grade, thanks to the local school library.

Alana in Canada said...

Thanks Wende.

Our library is wonderful.

My response turned into a post!

scb said...

I was going to comment yesterday, but yesterday got away from me! Sometimes I think you're reading ahead in the homeschooling book I'm reading, just to get me to think about how to apply what I'm reading! ;)

Just after reading this post about science, I went to the dining room to have my snack and read some of that book. The chapter I was about to start reading turned out to be (you guessed it) How to make science and history interesting! Interesting coincidence.

Anyway, it got me thinking about science and what worked for me as a student and what didn't, and I'm doing a post about that.

I also did some thinking about learning about the Human Body, and here are some thoughts off the top of my head... (trying to link various subjects together -- this book I'm reading is big on unit studies) ...

You and the kids could learn the latin names for the basic parts of the human body. Why do doctors use latin in their practice?

What does the Bible say about the Human Body? (e.g. the body is the temple of God's spirit; all the parts of the body are interconnected and what happens to one part affects all the rest of the body -- okay, I'm stretching it there, that one's actually comparing the church to the human body...)

Cooking and nutrition could play into this, learning what foods are good for the body and how to prepare them (cooking is chemistry, really)

How is the puppy's body different from ours? how is it the same? Why do you (they) suppose that's the case?

scb said...

and I meant to comment -- 14 schools in 12 years? Ack!!

Although not changing schools that often does not necessarily translate into a good education in science. I went to our small town school from Grades 1-10, then moved to the city for Grades 11-12. The small town had its limitations, and there wasn't the hands-on approach to learning that would have benefited me. I quickly became a science-phobe.

Jessica said...

Alana
Can you reload your old template? Your page is all screwy, the header border is too wide. I hope you saved your old template.

I can't help, I'm a try it and see what it does type.

:) Jessica